Does Larry fail God’s challenge in “A Serious Man”?

serious

The Coen brothers have returned with another stellar film, “A Serious Man,” following their two previous releases, “No Country for Old Men” and the celeb-packed “Burn After Reading.” This film, set in a 1960′s Minneapolis suburb featuring the most gorgeous mid-century modern furniture ever, follows the life of Larry, which goes from okay to mortally damned.

If you want to read the entire plot of the film, go check out it’s wikipedia page. It’s complicated, dense and somewhat jarring… and like what many reviews say, if you’re not Jewish, you’re going to miss out on a massive swath of humour and meaning.

Despite what I’ve read about the film, some things continue to puzzle me, and still haven’t found a decent explanation for.

1. “A Serious Man” is loosely based on the book of Job, a story about a man who is caught up in at bet of sorts between God and the Devil. Job looses everything, and despite the council he receives from his friends, and despite the bitterness and pain he feels, he does not turn away from God. So to me, it looks like Larry is Job, losing his family and his possessions and his health… simple. I’m still torn on the role of the rabbis, they are either Job’s friends or God himself in person form… if they are his friends, they are offering him useless advice that he doesn’t really take, or if they are God, he is asking them serious questions and not getting much of a response. Either way, I’m okay with that reading.

2. The ending. When Larry finally changes the grade to C- instead of F, within minutes he gets the urgent call from his doctor, and his son is moments away from being ripped out of the ground by a tornado. On one hand, this could be the continuing of Larry’s trials, or the way I see it as, which Larry actually gives up on God and living a “serious” and honest life, and changes the grade. Immediately after he changes the grade, God’s wrath manifests itself physically in his body and as a tornado, about to destroy his only son. Harsh.

3. The prologue. I admit that about 5 minutes into this, I was wondering if I had stumbled into the wrong theatre. In a way, it seems pretty simple. The visitor isn’t defined as being an evil spirit or a regular person (he’s listed as “?” in the credits), which works on the same principles of the theory relayed later in the film about Schrodinger’s cat.

Which leads to Larry’s massive physics diagrams about how you can specifically explain why you can’t actually know anything (and still be responsible for it). I think for a lot of religious people, Christians included, that from a certain philosophical standpoint, an unknowable deity or God cannot be rationally explained. It seems like a straightforward idea, and I like how it’s presented in “A Serious Man.”

If you have any ideas about the film, please share them… I’d love to hear it. It’s going to be a shame that I’ll likely have to wait until after Oscar season before anyone wants to talk about this I guessing.

You know what, ‘Fireproof,’ you’re alright by me

Fireproof-fix_jpg_595x325_crop_upscale_q85

Like most of my urban dwelling brethren, I’m pretty cut off from most mainstream Christian culture, especially culture born waaaay south of the border. Sure, downtown we love our Sufjan Stevens and Thrices, but most of the younger, young-ish and young-at-heart people I know are not really going to perk up when someone mentions “The Well.”

I don’t think it’s necessarily an attitude thing, nor a “we’re more sophisticated” type thing either… downtown, churches are more likely to be “plants,” store-fronts, locals, stuffy, alternative or traditional. Like our city, the church presence is very diverse.

But despite all that diversity, there’s not much in the way of Christian media in the core; there are hardly any “Christian” radio stations, there’s no “Michaels” (but we do have our Crux!), and most of all, we don’t have any mega-churches. And without that “large-group” environment, a lot of content, good and bad, passes on undetected. I think that easily explains why Rob Bell’s previous visit to Toronto was (by my impression) almost entirely attended by out-of-town 905ers and beyond.

OK, I’m way off topic here and I’m not planning on peeling back that thought any further for now.

So there’s this movie, “Fireproof,” which most people won’t look twice at, except for the fact that it’s probably the most popular, mainstream “Christian” movie today. Starring everyone’s favourite Evangelical punching bag, Kirk Cameron (yep, from “Growing Pains”), who plays a firefighter with a very Christian name, the very cheesy flick follows him as he takes on a “Love Dare” while trying to save his marriage.

“Rescue Me” it ain’t.

With a tag line of “Never Leave Your Partner Behind” (which you will of course hear in reference to fighting fires and in marriage), I won’t harp on the film too much, because it only cost half a million dollars to produce, and it ended up grossing over 33 million since its release last year.

Like I said before, it’s very cheesy, and at times the production can be amateur, but about halfway through the flick, it seems to get i’ts act together and become a real movie. Sure, it keeps mucking up it’s “Marriage is Fireproof” theme: love is a spark, fire threatens to burn your marriage down, lighting a fire = rekindling a romance; but despite my criticisms there, I will have to admit that this movie does have a great message.

At the heart of the film, it’s quite literally a lesson in love; there’s a “Love Dare” that Caleb takes, and yep, you can get a version of the love dare in book form. There’s speeches and long talks that feel like they’ve been born from a pulpit, and when Caleb’s dad discovers his unbelieving son lives near an old Christian summer camp, complete with firepit and wooden cross, you know that somebody’s going to be kneeling in front of it by the end of the movie. Even if they have a horrible “Georgia” accent (ahem, Cameron).

Despite my cynic attitude, there’s lots of things I enjoyed about the movie: It’s very “south,” with lots of drawl and male posturing, which at once feels real and down to earth, all the actors are more or less non-actors, which adds to the sincerity (Caleb’s mother actually looks like she could be someone’s mother. Much love to Ken Bevel as well, he was the best and most prominent non-actor in the movie, and he totally rocked it), and sometimes I wonder if all the cheesiness is intentional: giving couples who initially watch the movie together something to make fun of before they are truly bombarded by the sincere gospel message presented here.

Looking over the special features on the DVD, it gave me an extra appreciation that I wouldn’t have gotten just from the film itself. The outtakes show just how much fun they had shooting this mostly-depressing film, the moments where cast and crew pray before shooting every day is totally inspiring, and to hear about why the filmmakers took on this project were enlightening (basically they feel like marriage is under attack… however, it looks like they’re not going anywhere near the “gay marriage” issue here).

A point they make in the special features that I really appreciate, is that this is a film you don’t often see: It looks at people’s lives after they live “happily ever after” and before something “tragic and life changing” happens. It’s when the monotony of day to day life and unfulfilled dreams take root, and to the film’s credit, I applaud it for taking a realistic look at what that life experience is like.

So, if you’re a Christian, in a “Christian” marriage, or even have friends who are receptive to the gospel and maybe even having some marriage troubles, I would suggest “Fireproof” is worth a watch.

Other Interesting notes:

  • Kirk Cameron, in lieu of payment, donated his paycheck to his favourite charity, Camp Firefly
  • From what I can tell, pretty much everyone involved in the film is a volunteer
  • Apparently Kirk Cameron refuses to kiss any other woman, even on screen, so in Fireproof, when his character does kiss his wife, its Kirks wife dressed up as the main character
  • Every location the film shot at was provided without payment required
  • Every “house” scene was shot in the same house

My (favourite) 14 movies to watch before you die

William Petersen in "To Live and Die in LA"

William Petersen in "To Live and Die in LA"

I’m taking a cue from the “14 Movies” list that Adam McKay and Will Ferell proposed (which I saw via EW.com), and put together a list of my most recommended flicks, outside of the ones you probably have seen by now. These are my picks, outside of imdb’s top 250, in no particular order, that you must watch.

  1. Primer (2004)
  2. The Saddest Music in the World (2003)
  3. Airheads (1994)
  4. The Brotherhood of the Wolf (2001)
  5. To Live and Die in LA (1985)
  6. Blow Up (1966)
  7. New Waterford Girl (1999)
  8. Purple Rain (1984)
  9. Wayne’s World (1992)
  10. Flight of the Navigator (1986)
  11. Mean Guns (1997)
  12. The Red Violin (1998)
  13. Edward Scissorhands (1990)
  14. Speed (1994)

2008: Movies watched, rated.

Rating System:

A+ = Don’t Miss It, Life-Changing, Classic
A = Very Solid Recommendation, Very Well Made
B+ = Solid Recommendation
B = Recommended
B- = Alright, still worth a watch
C = Watch at your own risk
D = Avoid
F = Waste of Film, Time and Money

Another note: This includes every film I watched in 2008, included films previously screened, and rated as per that viewing. It also combines film screenings with DVD rentals. However, they are not listed in any order beyond the general grade rating.

THE BEST OF 2008

The Godfather — A+
Blade Runner — A+
There Will Be Blood — A+
Prince Caspian — A+
Wall-E — A+
Control — A+
Rushmore — A+
Tron — A+
Airheads — A+
The Big Lebowski — A+
Heavy Metal in Baghdad — A+
Synechdoce, New York — A+
Frost/Nixon — A+
Brand Upon the Brain! — A+
Joe Strummer: The Future is Unwritten — A+

Hellboy: Golden Army — A
My Kid Could Paint That — A
Kingdom of the Crystal Skulls — A
Gran Torino — A
Iron Man — A
3:10 to Yuma — A
Raiders of the Lost Ark — A
Speed Racer — A
Man on Wire — A
Kung Fu Panda — A
Futurama: Bender’s Game — A
What We Do Is Secret — A
Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade — A
Tropic Thunder — A
Ghost Ride the Whip (doc) — A
Paranoid Park — A
The Changeling — A

THE REST

The Darjeeling Limited — B+
Wanted — B+
Forgetting Sarah Marshall — B+
The Dark Night — B+
The Counterfitters — B+
Slumdog Millionaire — B+
Be Kind, Rewind — B+
Redacted — B+
Burn After Reading — B+
War, Inc — B+
Taxi to the Dark Side — B+

The Eldritch Influence: (Lovecraft doc) — B
American Gangster — B
Shine a Light — B
The Hunting Party — B
CTV Movie: Mayerthorpe — B
Gone Baby Gone — B
The Myst — B
The Beast with a Billion Backs — B
The Rocker — B
Street Kings — B
Leatherheads — B
Don’t Mess with the Zohan — B
NetherBeast Incorporated — B

The Love Guru — B-
I’m Not There — B-
Pineapple Express — B-
Once — B-
The Happening — B-
Hamlet 2 — B -
Hancock — B -

Cloverfield — C
Chalk — C
Charlie Bartlett — C
Dan in Real Life — C
Southland Tales — C
Ocean’s Thirteen — C
Lars and the Real Girl — C

La Vie en Rose — D
Juno — D
The Tracy Fragments — D
Jumper — D
Untraceable — D
The Bank Job — D
Drillbit Taylor — D
The Hulk — D

Vantage Point — F

Classic Christmas Films

Scrooged
Gremlins
Home Alone
Bad Santa
It’s a Wonderful Life
Colbert Christmas
Ernest Saves Christmas

Not-so-good Christmas Films

Surviving Christmas
Eight Crazy Nights
National Lamoon’s Christmas Vacation

FAVOURITE NEW FILM OF 2008

Speed Racer.

BIGGEST SURPRISE/FAVOURITE RECOMMENDATION OF 2008

Street Kings